Buy on Amazon
CA$44.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 183 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$44.99 vs CA$1149.12
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 9% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G4900 - 262 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Celeron G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for CA$44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75702 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
262
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1149.12
3%
FPS Winner
AMD YD292XA8AFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Processor 4.3 GHz Max Boost 38MB Cache
Buy for CA$1,149.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75703 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
48.35164835164835%
Multi-Core
1051
14.099812181379127%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
