Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 601 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$49.99 vs CA$1580.77
- Up to 89% better value when playing League of Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$0.72 vs CA$6.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 54 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 254% better in League of Legends than Celeron G4900 - 244 vs 69 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 48 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
69
28%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 292 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
244
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.48/FPS
11%
Price, CA$
CA$1580.77
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,580.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 292 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 48 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |