Buy on Amazon
CA$49.99
In Stock
Celeron G4900 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.
3.1 GHz | 2-core
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
3.8 GHz | 24-core
Buy for CA$1,580.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
3.1 GHz | 2-core
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
3.8 GHz | 24-core
Buy for CA$1,580.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
MSRP in USD: $42
MSRP in USD: $1399
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 601 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
110
80%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
136
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$11.62/FPS
3%
Price, CA$
CA$1580.77
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,580.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 48 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.