Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3960X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3960X is 2332 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-3960X - CA$108.0 vs CA$500.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-3960X - CA$1.16 vs CA$5.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-3960X - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G4900 - 94 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
93
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10307 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
94
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.32/FPS
21%
Price, CA$
CA$500
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$500 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10302 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-3960X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |