Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2106 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - CA$49.99 vs CA$853.05
- Up to 90% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-14900F - CA$0.31 vs CA$3.14 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 69% better in Rust than Celeron G4900 - 272 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
161
59%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18024 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
272
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.14/FPS
9%
Price, CA$
CA$853.05
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$853.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18024 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |