Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 167 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 38% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$343.92 vs CA$552.98
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 2600 - 171 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$343.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
171
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$552.98
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$552.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1152
90.42386185243329%
Multi-Core
4841
64.94499597531527%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |