Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 810 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - CA$290.0 vs CA$758.34
- Up to 60% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 9 3900XT - CA$2.44 vs CA$6.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 2600 - 125 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
119
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$290
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$290 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13928 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.07/FPS
40%
Price, CA$
CA$758.34
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$758.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13927 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |