Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 2090 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - CA$290.0 vs CA$878.06
- Up to 61% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-14900 - CA$2.44 vs CA$6.32 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 2600 - 139 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
119
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$290
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$290 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13869 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
139
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.32/FPS
38%
Price, CA$
CA$878.06
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$878.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13868 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |