Buy on Amazon
CA$89
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $219
Availability
MSRP in USD: $219
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 121 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$89.0 vs CA$800.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$0.5 vs CA$4.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Ryzen 5 1600 - 180 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
179
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$89
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 65W AM4 Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler (YD1600BBAFBOX)
Buy for CA$89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.44/FPS
11%
Price, CA$
CA$800
11%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor (YD195XA8AEWOF)
Buy for CA$800 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
