Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 1062 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 4% better in Halo Infinite than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 164 vs 158 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$642.17 vs CA$999.46
- Up to 38% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$3.92 vs CA$6.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
158
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.33/FPS
61%
Price, CA$
CA$999.46
64%
Buy for CA$999.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11453 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
164
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.92/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$642.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$642.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11456 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |