Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900K - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 21% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 114 vs 94 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$699.99 vs CA$885.66
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
94
82.45614035087719%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$885.66
79%
Buy for CA$885.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Buy for CA$699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
66.95254431103488%
Multi-Core
7539
82.27654698242934%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |