Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 1062 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 203 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$776.87 vs CA$885.66
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
201
99.01477832512316%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$885.66
87%
Buy for CA$885.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Buy for CA$776.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
66.60978384527873%
Multi-Core
7539
88.8928192430138%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |