Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 152 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - CA$89.0 vs CA$600.75
- Up to 85% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-7920X - CA$0.67 vs CA$4.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 5 1600 - 135 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 24 vs 12 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
132
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
135
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.45/FPS
15%
Price, CA$
CA$600.75
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |