Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 513 days older than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 7% better in War Thunder than Athlon 200GE - 161 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - CA$156.4 vs CA$270.83
- Up to 38% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen 5 1600 - CA$1.04 vs CA$1.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
161
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.68/FPS
61.904761904761905%
Price, CA$
CA$270.83
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$270.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3996 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
151
93.7888198757764%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$156.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$156.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3997 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Single-Core
889
83.23970037453184%
Multi-Core
1857
40.56356487549148%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Athlon |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |