Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 2160 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8150 - 204 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - CA$87.12 vs CA$600.75
- Up to 84% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-7920X - CA$0.46 vs CA$2.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 125 vs 140 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
204
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.94/FPS
15%
Price, CA$
CA$600.75
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
190
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |