Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 250 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-7100 - 553 vs 539 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - CA$193.88 vs CA$600.75
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75921 minutes ago
Buy for CA$193.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75921 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1247
91.42228739002933%
Multi-Core
2440
26.807295099978028%
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |