Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1631 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 64% better in Diablo IV than FX-6300 - 156 vs 95 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - CA$66.51 vs CA$250.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Diablo IV than Ryzen 5 1600 - CA$0.7 vs CA$1.6 per FPS
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
156
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.6/FPS
43.74999999999999%
Price, CA$
CA$250
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44030 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
95
60.89743589743589%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44029 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |