Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is 1710 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than FX-8350 - 118 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
111
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |