Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 3117 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 9% better in Fortnite than FX-6100 - 230 vs 211 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 63% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - CA$99.02 vs CA$265.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Fortnite than Ryzen 3 3300X - CA$0.47 vs CA$1.15 per FPS
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
230
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.15/FPS
40%
Price, CA$
CA$265
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
211
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$99.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$99.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |