Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 3737 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-12500 - CA$98.43 vs CA$249.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-12500 - CA$0.68 vs CA$1.56 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 11% better in Dead Space than FX-6100 - 160 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
144
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
160
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.56/FPS
43%
Price, CA$
CA$249
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-12500 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |