Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 3737 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 9% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than FX-8150 - 194 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-12500 - CA$87.12 vs CA$244.16
- Up to 61% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i5-12500 - CA$0.49 vs CA$1.26 per FPS
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
194
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.26/FPS
38%
Price, CA$
CA$244.16
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$244.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
178
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12500 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |