Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 2805 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4590.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-4590 - 459 vs 401 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4590 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4590 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i5-12500 - CA$172.79 vs CA$244.29
- Up to 19% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-12500 - CA$0.43 vs CA$0.53 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
459
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
81%
Price, CA$
CA$244.29
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$244.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
401
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$172.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$172.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12500 | vs | Intel Core i5-4590 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |