Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4590 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4590 is 555 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-8320 - 172 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 38% cheaper than FX-8320 - CA$190.8 vs CA$307.17
- Up to 40% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-8320 - CA$1.11 vs CA$1.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4590 - 8 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
172
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$190.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$190.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17296 minutes ago
Buy for CA$307.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17295 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4590 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |