Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2825 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 6% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-6100 - 336 vs 316 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 39% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - CA$80.8 vs CA$133.07
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 6 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for CA$133.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74224 minutes ago
Buy for CA$80.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74223 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Picasso | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |