Buy on Amazon
CA$180
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $99
Availability
MSRP in USD: $99
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 752 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 16% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G4900 - 108 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - CA$49.99 vs CA$180.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 3100 - CA$0.54 vs CA$1.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 3100
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
108
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.67/FPS
32%
Price, CA$
CA$180
27%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 3.6GHz Wraith Stealth 2MB L2 Desktop Processor Boxed
Buy for CA$180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18589 minutes ago
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
93
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18588 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 3100
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Matisse | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
