Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200U is 2280 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than FX-6100 - 261 vs 249 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200U - 6 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
249
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |