Buy on Amazon
CA$108
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 3659 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Phenom X4 9650 - 129 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 54 vs 95 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
129
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$108
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for CA$108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3667 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
38.63636363636363%
Multi-Core
765
72.78782112274025%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Agena | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
