Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 2714 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Phenom X4 9650 - 212 vs 210 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 54 vs 95 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
212
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$88.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3662 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
34.293948126801155%
Multi-Core
765
64.61148648648648%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Pentium |
Agena | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |