Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 27% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$182.45 vs CA$250.0
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 127% better in Diablo IV than FX-8350 - 220 vs 97 FPS
- Up to 39% better value when playing Diablo IV than FX-8350 - CA$1.14 vs CA$1.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
220
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
72%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |