Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 1467 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 3% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-6700 - 138 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$228.88 vs CA$899.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$1.71 vs CA$6.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
138
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.51/FPS
26%
Price, CA$
CA$899
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16482 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
134
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$228.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$228.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16483 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Matisse | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |