Buy on Amazon
CA$87.12
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 2185 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-8700K - CA$87.12 vs CA$314.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i7-8700K - CA$1.85 vs CA$2.85 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 134% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than FX-8150 - 110 vs 47 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
47
42%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.85/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-8150 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Core i7-8700K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
110
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.85/FPS
64%
Price, CA$
CA$314
27%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-8700K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 3.7GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W
Buy for CA$314 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i7-8700K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700K |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
