Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 938 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 1% better in Halo Infinite than Core i5-10400F - 163 vs 161 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-8700K - CA$157.24 vs CA$314.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i7-8700K - CA$0.98 vs CA$1.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
163
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.93/FPS
50%
Price, CA$
CA$314
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$314 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8757 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
161
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$157.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$157.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8757 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700K | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |