Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 555 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 22 than FX-6300 - 253 vs 252 FPS
- Up to 59% cheaper than FX-6300 - CA$41.21 vs CA$101.54
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$101.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 337 minutes ago
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 337 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |