Buy on Amazon
CA$98.43
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $380
Availability
MSRP in USD: $380
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 565 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 4% better in God of War than FX-6100 - 169 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 47 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
162
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-6100 FX6100 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD6100WMW6KGU FD6100WMGUSBX
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
