Buy on Amazon
CA$36.09
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8350 and the cheaper FX-4300 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 80% cheaper than FX-8350 - CA$36.09 vs CA$182.45
- Up to 80% better value when playing World of Warcraft than FX-8350 - CA$0.23 vs CA$1.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Warcraft than FX-4300 - 156 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 8 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
155
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-4300 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.8 GHz 4M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
156
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.17/FPS
19%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
19%
FPS Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-8350 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 4 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | FX |
| Vishera | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
