Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600K outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8600K is 1808 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-8600K - CA$36.09 vs CA$205.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-8600K - CA$0.22 vs CA$1.08 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4300 - 190 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 6 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
167
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10389 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
190
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.08/FPS
20%
Price, CA$
CA$205
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$205 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10393 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i5-8600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |