Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 881 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than EPYC 7302P - 108 vs 101 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
108
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.05/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Celeron |
Rome | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
155 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |