Buy on Amazon
CA$122.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690 outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4690 is 1924 days older than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 7% better in Minecraft than EPYC 7302P - 682 vs 636 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 84 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-4690
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
682
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$122.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-4690 Processor (6M Cache, 3.90 GHz) BX80646I54690
Buy for CA$122.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-4690
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 84 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
