Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Core i7-4790 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 1924 days newer than Core i7-4790.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 4% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-4790 - 357 vs 342 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4790 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 84 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
342
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$96.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$96.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i7-4790 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Rome | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 84 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |