Buy on Amazon
CA$85.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4370 outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4370 is 1843 days older than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 5 than EPYC 7302P - 204 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 54 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4370
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
204
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$85.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-4370 3.8 GHz FCLGA1150 Processor (BX80646I34370)
Buy for CA$85.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i3-4370
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i3-4370 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Rome | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 155 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
