Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3153 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5680
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 22% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon X5680 - 175 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5680 - 24 vs 12 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.95/FPS
100%
Price, $
$692.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $692.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |