Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon X5670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3536 days newer than Xeon X5670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5670
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon X5670 - 178 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon X5670 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5670 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon X5670
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5670 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Athlon |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
