Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Xeon X5660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1637 days newer than Xeon X5660.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon X5660 - 154 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon X5660 - 85 vs 95 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon X5660
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5660 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
