Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Xeon X5660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700U is 3218 days newer than Xeon X5660.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5660
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700U - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Performs up to 5% better in Sons Of The Forest than Xeon X5660 - 96 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Xeon X5660 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5660 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5660 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700U |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 15 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
No | Overclockable | No |