Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4677 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 35% better in Lost Ark than Xeon W3680 - 305 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 32 vs 12 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
305
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$435
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5030 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |