Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 2726 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 130 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 7% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon W3680 - 294 vs 276 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 28 vs 12 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
294
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$397.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $397.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5644 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
12 | Threads | 28 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |