Buy on Amazon
$63.92
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon W3680 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W3680 is 2485 days older than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Performs up to 4% better in League of Legends than Celeron G3930 - 71 vs 68 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
68
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930 Dual-core (2 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
