Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 2485 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 13% better in Valorant than Xeon W3680 - 781 vs 692 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 60 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
781
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6336 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |