Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3671 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3565
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 3% better in Fortnite than Xeon W3565 - 220 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon W3565 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3565 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon W3565
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Athlon |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
