Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2135 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2135 is 677 days older than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2135
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 3 3200G - 151 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2135 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2135 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
149
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2135 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon W | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |