Buy on Amazon
$63.92
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $444
Availability
MSRP in USD: $444
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2125 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2125 is 238 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2125
- Performs up to 11% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G3930 - 254 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2125 - 51 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2125 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
228
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930 Dual-core (2 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon W-2125
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2125 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 120 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
